The expression encapsulates the opposed experiences some people report following neurofeedback remedy. These narratives typically describe a worsening of pre-existing situations or the emergence of recent, debilitating signs. For instance, an individual looking for aid from nervousness via neurofeedback may report elevated nervousness or the event of melancholy post-treatment.
Understanding this sentiment is essential for knowledgeable decision-making relating to neurofeedback. Potential advantages, similar to improved focus and emotional regulation, are often highlighted. Nevertheless, acknowledging the potential for unfavorable outcomes offers a balanced perspective. Traditionally, neurofeedback has been used for varied situations, and its efficacy and security stay areas of ongoing analysis and debate throughout the medical and scientific communities.
This text will delve into components doubtlessly contributing to unfavorable experiences related to neurofeedback, discover the significance of correct evaluation and personalised remedy protocols, and study different therapeutic approaches. Moreover, it can emphasize the need of complete knowledgeable consent and open communication between practitioners and people contemplating neurofeedback.
1. Worsened pre-existing situations
The connection between worsened pre-existing situations and the sentiment “neurofeedback ruined my life” typically stems from a cascade of unexpected occasions. Neurofeedback, meant to modulate mind exercise, can inadvertently exacerbate underlying vulnerabilities. Take into account the person with a gentle, undiagnosed seizure dysfunction looking for neurofeedback for consideration deficits. The remedy, whereas doubtlessly useful for focus, may inadvertently set off extra frequent or intense seizure exercise. The outcome is just not merely a failure to enhance, however a tangible decline in neurological well-being. This represents a situation the place the intervention actively diminishes the standard of life, doubtlessly resulting in the expression of profound remorse.
One other instance includes people with latent nervousness problems. Neurofeedback, aimed toward decreasing nervousness signs, can generally overwhelm the person’s coping mechanisms, resulting in panic assaults or heightened nervousness ranges. What was as soon as a manageable situation transforms right into a debilitating wrestle, disrupting every day life and fueling the sensation that the remedy has brought about irreparable hurt. These experiences underscore the vital significance of thorough pre-treatment assessments. Figuring out and addressing pre-existing situations is important to mitigating dangers and guaranteeing affected person security.
In the end, the phrase “neurofeedback ruined my life,” when linked to worsened pre-existing situations, illustrates the complicated interaction between intervention and particular person physiology. It emphasizes the need of a cautious, personalised method to neurofeedback remedy, one which prioritizes affected person security and acknowledges the potential for unintended, opposed outcomes. Failing to acknowledge and handle these dangers can result in vital private struggling and erode belief within the therapeutic course of.
2. Emergence of recent signs
The declare that neurofeedback irrevocably altered one’s existence typically finds its roots within the unwelcome arrival of totally new signs post-treatment. These aren’t mere exacerbations of present points, however beforehand unexperienced disturbances that essentially change a person’s expertise. This emergence can foster a deep sense of betrayal and loss, solidifying the conviction that neurofeedback has brought about lasting hurt.
-
Insomnia and Sleep Disturbances
Previous to neurofeedback, restful sleep might have been a given. Put up-treatment, nevertheless, the person may discover themselves battling persistent insomnia, vivid nightmares, or disrupted sleep cycles. The fixed fatigue and cognitive impairment ensuing from this new sleep problem can dismantle every day functioning, profoundly impacting work, relationships, and general high quality of life. The person now faces not solely the unique situation that prompted the remedy but additionally the added burden of a crippling sleep drawback immediately attributed to the intervention.
-
Elevated Anxiousness and Panic Assaults
Whereas neurofeedback generally targets nervousness, paradoxical reactions can happen. A person may develop intense nervousness signs, together with debilitating panic assaults, the place none existed earlier than. The sudden onset of those episodes can result in social isolation, concern of public areas, and a pervasive sense of dread. The person now grapples with a situation that considerably impairs their skill to have interaction in regular actions, a direct consequence of a remedy meant to advertise calm.
-
Cognitive Impairment and “Mind Fog”
The cognitive realm is especially susceptible. Beforehand sharp and clear considering could be changed by a persistent “mind fog,” characterised by problem concentrating, reminiscence issues, and impaired government operate. Easy duties grow to be monumental challenges, and the flexibility to study or course of data declines considerably. The person experiences a tangible lack of cognitive talents, making it troublesome to carry out work-related duties or interact in intellectually stimulating actions. The sentiment that one thing basic has been altered turns into a continuing companion.
-
Emotional Dysregulation
Neurofeedback’s influence on emotional stability could be unpredictable. The emergence of recent signs may embrace dramatic temper swings, elevated irritability, or problem regulating feelings. A beforehand even-tempered particular person may discover themselves experiencing sudden bursts of anger or overwhelming unhappiness. This emotional curler coaster can pressure relationships and create vital private misery. The person feels alienated from themselves, as if their emotional responses have been hijacked by an exterior power, leaving them with the unsettling feeling that neurofeedback has irreparably broken their emotional panorama.
The emergence of those novel signs paints a grim image, reinforcing the phrase “neurofeedback ruined my life.” These aren’t merely negative effects; they characterize a basic shift within the particular person’s baseline state, creating new challenges that may overshadow the preliminary drawback for which neurofeedback was sought. These experiences spotlight the essential want for cautious monitoring throughout and after neurofeedback remedy, in addition to a radical understanding of the potential dangers concerned.
3. Insufficient preliminary evaluation
The sentiment “neurofeedback ruined my life” often echoes the implications of a vital oversight: an insufficient preliminary evaluation. This foundational step, meant to meticulously consider a person’s suitability for neurofeedback, typically proves inadequate, setting the stage for doubtlessly devastating outcomes. The phrase itself could be seen as a lament over a missed alternative for cautious analysis, a safeguard that might have prevented appreciable struggling.
-
Failure to Determine Co-existing Circumstances
Many people looking for neurofeedback current with a fancy tapestry of underlying points. Maybe refined temper problems, undiagnosed seizure vulnerabilities, or unrecognized persona traits exist beneath the floor. A rushed or incomplete evaluation can simply overlook these vital components. Consequently, neurofeedback, utilized with out contemplating these pre-existing situations, can set off a cascade of unfavorable reactions, exacerbating the hidden situations and resulting in unexpected problems. The person, as a substitute of discovering aid, experiences a worsening of their general well-being, immediately attributable to the preliminary failure to determine and account for these co-existing vulnerabilities.
-
Inadequate Neurological Analysis
Neurofeedback immediately interacts with mind exercise, making a radical neurological evaluation paramount. Nevertheless, the mandatory depth of investigation is usually missing. A superficial EEG studying or a reliance on subjective questionnaires can paint an incomplete image of the person’s neurological panorama. A pre-existing, refined brainwave abnormality, for instance, could be missed, and neurofeedback might inadvertently amplify this irregularity, resulting in neurological misery. The person’s expertise turns into a testomony to the significance of complete neurological analysis and the potential risks of continuing with out it.
-
Neglecting Psychological Historical past
Psychological historical past performs a significant function in figuring out a person’s suitability for neurofeedback. Trauma, previous psychiatric diagnoses, and even persona traits can considerably affect the result of the remedy. An evaluation that fails to delve into this historical past dangers overlooking potential contraindications. As an example, a person with a historical past of extreme nervousness or dissociation may discover their signs amplified by neurofeedback, resulting in heightened misery and a way of psychological unraveling. The shortage of consideration for psychological components transforms the meant remedy right into a supply of profound struggling.
-
Lack of Baseline Information Assortment
With out establishing a transparent baseline of cognitive and emotional functioning, it turns into difficult to objectively consider the results of neurofeedback. A complete pre-treatment evaluation ought to embrace cognitive testing, temper scales, and an in depth evaluation of every day functioning. This information offers a reference level towards which post-treatment modifications could be measured. With out it, distinguishing between real enhancements, unfavorable results, or mere placebo responses turns into practically unattainable. The absence of this vital baseline leaves the person susceptible to experiencing a deterioration with no clear understanding of its trigger or severity, doubtlessly resulting in the lament “neurofeedback ruined my life.”
These interconnected aspects underscore the grave penalties of an insufficient preliminary evaluation. The expression “neurofeedback ruined my life” turns into a haunting reminder of the significance of thorough analysis and the potential for hurt when this significant step is ignored. It highlights the duty of practitioners to prioritize affected person security and conduct complete assessments earlier than embarking on any neurofeedback protocol.
4. Improper remedy protocols
The load of “neurofeedback ruined my life” typically bears down upon the shoulders of improper remedy protocols. It’s a story of fine intentions gone awry, a path paved with mismatched frequencies and misguided purposes. The mind, a fragile and sophisticated organ, doesn’t reply kindly to crude changes. When protocols are utilized with out precision, with no deep understanding of particular person brainwave patterns, the outcomes could be devastating. It’s akin to tuning a finely crafted instrument with a sledgehammer the concord is shattered, changed by dissonance. The significance of correct protocols can’t be overstated; they’re the bedrock upon which profitable neurofeedback rests. With out them, the remedy turns into a bet, a reckless roll of the cube with a person’s psychological well-being at stake.
Take into account the situation of a younger grownup looking for aid from attention-deficit hyperactivity dysfunction (ADHD). An improperly designed protocol, specializing in suppressing sure brainwave frequencies with out regard to their broader operate, inadvertently dampens creativity and spontaneity. The person’s focus improves marginally, however at the price of their inventive aptitude and modern considering. The colourful colours of their internal world fade to grey, and a way of vacancy pervades. This final result, immediately ensuing from the flawed protocol, solidifies the conviction that neurofeedback has irrevocably diminished their life. One other occasion includes a person scuffling with persistent ache. A practitioner, missing adequate experience, applies a generic protocol with out accounting for the complicated interaction between ache alerts and emotional regulation. The remedy exacerbates the ache, triggering nervousness and melancholy. The person is trapped in a cycle of escalating struggling, feeling deserted by a remedy that promised aid however delivered solely despair. The sensible significance of understanding correct protocols lies in prevention. It’s the distinction between a rigorously orchestrated symphony and a cacophonous din.
The story of “neurofeedback ruined my life” as instructed via the lens of improper remedy protocols serves as a cautionary reminder. It emphasizes the vital want for rigorous coaching, meticulous evaluation, and personalised remedy plans. The problem lies in guaranteeing that practitioners possess the experience to navigate the intricacies of brainwave modulation and that they method every particular person with a deep sense of duty and care. In the end, the aim is to remodel neurofeedback from a possible supply of hurt into a strong instrument for therapeutic and progress, one protocol at a time.
5. Lack of knowledgeable consent
The somber narrative of “neurofeedback ruined my life” often traces again to a basic moral breach: a scarcity of knowledgeable consent. The absence of this significant factor transforms a doubtlessly therapeutic intervention into an experiment performed with out the person’s full consciousness or voluntary participation. It is a story typically instructed in hushed tones, a chronicle of belief betrayed and autonomy disregarded. The threads connecting a scarcity of knowledgeable consent to such profound remorse are tightly woven, forming a material of bewilderment, dashed expectations, and, in the end, irreversible hurt.
Think about a situation: A person, looking for aid from persistent migraines, enters a neurofeedback clinic with hope and vulnerability. The practitioner, enthusiastic concerning the potential advantages, glosses over the potential dangers. The dialog focuses solely on success tales, portray a rosy image of pain-free days. The person, determined for respite, readily agrees to the remedy, unaware of the likelihood that the remedy might, the truth is, exacerbate the migraines or set off totally new neurological signs. Weeks later, the migraines are extra frequent and intense, accompanied by debilitating nervousness. The person feels trapped, a prisoner of a remedy they entered into willingly however with no true understanding of the potential penalties. That is the cruel actuality that underscores the phrase “neurofeedback ruined my life,” a direct results of a failure to supply complete and balanced data. The sensible significance is evident: knowledgeable consent is just not merely a formality; it’s a safeguard, a defend towards potential hurt.
The authorized and moral obligations of practitioners are paramount. People have to be totally knowledgeable of the potential dangers, advantages, and different therapies earlier than consenting to neurofeedback. This data needs to be introduced in a transparent, comprehensible method, avoiding technical jargon and permitting ample time for questions and reflection. Failing to supply such data not solely violates moral rules but additionally exposes practitioners to potential authorized legal responsibility. The lament, “neurofeedback ruined my life,” serves as a stark reminder of the profound influence of knowledgeable consent on the well-being of these looking for neurological intervention. It’s a name for higher transparency, accountability, and patient-centered care throughout the discipline of neurofeedback.
6. Unrealistic expectations
The phrase “neurofeedback ruined my life” typically whispers from the shadows of unrealistic expectations. A vulnerability exists when hope eclipses cause, and the promise of a fast repair overshadows the complexities of mind operate. These inflated expectations, fueled by overly optimistic advertising or incomplete understanding, can set the stage for profound disappointment and a way of irreversible injury when the remedy fails to ship.
-
Miraculous Treatment Fantasies
The attract of a single, transformative remedy could be intoxicating. People, burdened by years of persistent nervousness, debilitating melancholy, or persistent studying difficulties, might clutch onto neurofeedback as a final resort, projecting onto it the facility to erase their struggling totally. They envision a future free from the shackles of their situation, a lifetime of easy ease and boundless pleasure. When actuality inevitably falls in need of this idealized imaginative and prescient, the ensuing disillusionment could be crushing, leaving them feeling betrayed and even worse than earlier than. The chasm between expectation and final result turns into a supply of profound despair, echoing the sentiment that their lives have been irrevocably marred by neurofeedback.
-
Immediate Gratification Syndrome
In a world accustomed to prompt downloads and in a single day supply, an analogous impatience can permeate expectations surrounding neurofeedback. People might anticipate fast, dramatic enhancements inside just a few periods, failing to understand the gradual and nuanced nature of brainwave coaching. When progress is sluggish or uneven, frustration mounts, and the remedy is prematurely deserted. The unfulfilled promise of fast outcomes transforms into a way of failure, fueling the conviction that neurofeedback is ineffective and, maybe, even dangerous. The perceived waste of time, cash, and emotional power amplifies the unfavorable expertise, resulting in the lament “neurofeedback ruined my life.”
-
Ignoring Particular person Variability
The human mind is a singular and complicated panorama, formed by genetics, experiences, and numerous different components. Anticipating neurofeedback to provide uniform outcomes throughout various people is akin to prescribing the identical treatment to each affected person, no matter their particular wants or medical historical past. When neurofeedback is approached as a one-size-fits-all resolution, the potential for disappointment is critical. People might evaluate their progress to others, turning into discouraged once they fail to attain the identical stage of enchancment. This comparability can result in emotions of inadequacy and the assumption that neurofeedback is inherently flawed, contributing to the sentiment that their lives have been negatively impacted by the remedy.
-
Overlooking Way of life Elements
Neurofeedback is just not a magic bullet; it’s a instrument that works finest when built-in right into a holistic method to well-being. Anticipating neurofeedback to compensate for poor weight-reduction plan, lack of train, persistent stress, or insufficient sleep is unrealistic. These life-style components can considerably influence mind operate and may hinder the effectiveness of neurofeedback. When people neglect these important features of self-care and place all their hopes on neurofeedback, the ensuing disappointment could be profound. The unfulfilled promise of a remedy, coupled with the belief that life-style modifications are vital, can result in emotions of frustration and a way that neurofeedback has failed them, contributing to the expression that their life has in some way been broken.
These aspects, intertwined, create a fertile floor for disillusionment. The cry of “neurofeedback ruined my life” is usually not a condemnation of the remedy itself, however a lament over shattered illusions. It underscores the vital want for real looking expectations, complete training, and a patient-centered method to neurofeedback. Failing to handle these components can remodel a doubtlessly useful intervention right into a supply of lasting remorse, leaving people feeling disillusioned and betrayed.
7. Restricted practitioner experience
The phrase “neurofeedback ruined my life,” when whispered, typically carries the load of a practitioner’s inadequate talent. Neurofeedback, a nuanced artwork blended with scientific rigor, calls for a depth of understanding exceeding easy certification. It isn’t a mere software of protocols; it’s an orchestration of brainwave modulation, requiring a eager understanding of neuroanatomy, psychophysiology, and the intricate dance between the 2. When this experience falters, the remedy can remodel from a therapeutic balm right into a harmful power. Take into account the case of a younger lady looking for aid from post-traumatic stress dysfunction. She entrusted her mind to a practitioner who, whereas licensed, lacked the expertise to navigate the complexities of trauma. The practitioner, unknowingly, amplified suppressed emotional reminiscences, unleashing a torrent of tension and panic assaults. The lady’s signs, as soon as manageable, spiraled uncontrolled, leaving her feeling extra traumatized than earlier than. The significance of practitioner experience turned tragically clear: in untrained fingers, neurofeedback might reopen wounds as a substitute of therapeutic them. The lady’s lament was a stark reminder that good intentions aren’t sufficient; experience is the important compass guiding the neurofeedback journey.
The implications of restricted experience lengthen past exacerbating present situations. Improperly utilized protocols can create totally new issues, altering brainwave patterns in unintended and detrimental methods. Situations come up the place people develop persistent insomnia, cognitive fog, or emotional dysregulation following neurofeedback administered by inadequately educated practitioners. These people report a definite change of their baseline state, a sense of neurological dissonance that diminishes their high quality of life. The sensible significance lies within the vital want for rigorous coaching requirements and ongoing skilled growth throughout the discipline. Certification alone is inadequate; practitioners should display a mastery of neurofeedback rules and a dedication to moral, patient-centered care. Moreover, a strong system of mentorship and peer evaluation can assist be sure that practitioners obtain the steerage and help essential to navigate complicated instances and keep away from potential pitfalls. The problem lies in distinguishing certified practitioners from those that merely possess a certificates, and empowering people to make knowledgeable choices about their care.
In the end, the connection between “restricted practitioner experience” and “neurofeedback ruined my life” is a narrative of vulnerability and duty. It underscores the profound influence {that a} practitioner’s talent, or lack thereof, can have on a person’s well-being. It serves as a cautionary story, reminding us that the mind is a fragile and sophisticated organ, requiring a talented and compassionate hand to information its modulation. The answer lies in elevating coaching requirements, fostering a tradition of steady studying, and empowering people to hunt out practitioners who possess the experience vital to supply secure and efficient neurofeedback remedy. The narrative urges all concerned to acknowledge that restricted practitioner experience is usually a harmful ingredient to neurofeedback and the significance of guaranteeing practitioners have the training they should assist individuals. Solely then can the potential for hurt be minimized, and the promise of therapeutic be realized.
Incessantly Requested Questions
Understandably, accounts of unfavorable experiences related to neurofeedback increase quite a few questions. This part addresses some frequent inquiries, providing insights gleaned from reported incidents and knowledgeable views. It’s designed to supply readability and context, to not supply medical recommendation.
Query 1: Can neurofeedback genuinely worsen an individual’s situation? Is “neurofeedback ruined my life” a risk?
The chance, although not statistically frequent, exists. Some people report a worsening of pre-existing situations or the emergence of recent signs after neurofeedback periods. The declare that “neurofeedback ruined my life,” whereas a robust assertion, typically displays vital private misery and needs to be taken significantly. Elements similar to insufficient evaluation, improper protocols, or underlying vulnerabilities might contribute to unfavorable outcomes. Nevertheless, it’s essential to contemplate particular person circumstances and seek the advice of medical professionals for correct diagnoses.
Query 2: What pre-existing situations may make somebody extra susceptible to unfavorable results from neurofeedback?
People with refined, undiagnosed neurological points or these with a historical past of complicated psychological trauma could also be extra prone. Unrecognized seizure problems, underlying nervousness sensitivities, or a predisposition to dissociation could be exacerbated by poorly calibrated neurofeedback protocols. It is also been famous that any underlying situation needs to be disclosed previous to remedy to keep away from any additional points.
Query 3: What function does the practitioner play in mitigating the chance of unfavorable outcomes?
The practitioner’s experience and diligence are paramount. An intensive preliminary evaluation, personalised remedy plans, and cautious monitoring are essential. Practitioners have to be expert in figuring out potential dangers and adapting protocols to particular person wants. A lack of knowledge or a one-size-fits-all method can considerably improve the chance of opposed results.
Query 4: Is it doable to foretell who will expertise unfavorable results from neurofeedback?
Predicting outcomes with certainty stays difficult. Nevertheless, a complete pre-treatment analysis, together with neurological and psychological assessments, can assist determine potential vulnerabilities. Open communication between the person and practitioner relating to medical historical past and expectations can also be important. It could be troublesome to measure who will undergo penalties of neurofeedback because it has but to be decided, however all indicators resulting in neurofeedback negative effects is important.
Query 5: What steps needs to be taken if a person experiences unfavorable results throughout or after neurofeedback?
Quick communication with the practitioner is essential. Remedy might have to be adjusted or discontinued. Searching for session from a neurologist or different certified medical skilled can also be advisable. Documenting signs and sharing this data with healthcare suppliers is significant for correct prognosis and acceptable administration.
Query 6: How can knowledgeable consent assist stop unfavorable experiences with neurofeedback?
Knowledgeable consent ensures that people perceive the potential dangers, advantages, and options earlier than committing to neurofeedback. A complete dialogue about doable opposed results permits people to make an knowledgeable choice and weigh the potential advantages towards the dangers. It additionally units the stage for open communication and belief between the person and practitioner.
These FAQs underscore the significance of cautious consideration, thorough evaluation, and knowledgeable decision-making when considering neurofeedback. The narrative of “neurofeedback ruined my life” highlights the potential for hurt and the necessity for accountable, patient-centered care.
The next sections will delve into different therapeutic approaches and techniques for mitigating dangers related to neurofeedback.
Mitigating Threat
The shadow of “neurofeedback ruined my life” serves as a somber reminder: vigilance and knowledgeable decisions are paramount when contemplating this remedy. The next counsel emerges from the experiences of those that report opposed outcomes, reworking their remorse into steerage for others.
Tip 1: Search a Complete Neurological Analysis Earlier than Committing. Earlier than embarking on any neurofeedback protocol, insist upon a radical neurological evaluation. An EEG is a begin, however deeper investigations could also be warranted. Uncover any refined pre-existing situations that may very well be exacerbated by brainwave modulation.
Tip 2: Prioritize Practitioner Experience Above All Else. Certification is a baseline, not a assure. Examine a practitioner’s expertise, particularly with situations just like one’s personal. Search out these with a confirmed observe document and a willingness to reply probing questions on their strategies and outcomes.
Tip 3: Demand Clear Communication About Potential Dangers. Knowledgeable consent is just not merely a signature on a kind. Have interaction in a frank dialogue concerning the potential downsides of neurofeedback. Perceive the doable negative effects, even the uncommon and extreme ones. If a practitioner dismisses these issues or affords solely assurances, search a second opinion.
Tip 4: Mood Expectations with Life like Understanding. Neurofeedback is just not a miracle remedy. It’s a instrument which may be useful for some, however it’s not an alternative to complete medical and psychological care. Method neurofeedback with cautious optimism, understanding that progress could also be gradual and setbacks are doable.
Tip 5: Actively Monitor and Report Any Modifications, No Matter How Refined. Throughout and after neurofeedback periods, be vigilant for any modifications in temper, cognition, or bodily sensations. Even seemingly minor shifts may very well be early warning indicators of a unfavorable response. Report these modifications to the practitioner instantly.
Tip 6: Take into account Various Therapies First. Neurofeedback is just not the one possibility for addressing neurological or psychological issues. Discover different evidence-based therapies, similar to cognitive behavioral remedy (CBT), treatment, or life-style modifications. Generally, easier approaches could be simpler and fewer dangerous.
Tip 7: If Doubt Arises, Err on the Aspect of Warning. The mind is a fragile organ. If uncertainty prevails relating to a neurofeedback protocol, remedy plan, or a practitioner’s competence, discontinue periods. Pause, collect extra data, and re-evaluate the trail ahead. Belief is a vital part and a scarcity of belief within the course of is usually a signal that one thing is off.
The following pointers aren’t ensures towards unfavorable outcomes, however they’re important steps towards mitigating danger and making knowledgeable decisions. Heeding these classes, realized from the regrets of others, can assist to make sure that the pursuit of therapeutic doesn’t inadvertently result in hurt.
The next part explores different remedy choices.
A Remaining Observe of Warning
The previous exploration has illuminated the unsettling declare that “neurofeedback ruined my life.” Its a phrase born not of informal discontent, however typically from profound private misery a consequence of unexpected unfavorable outcomes arising from a remedy meant to heal. By examination of things like insufficient assessments, improper protocols, and unrealistic expectations, a clearer understanding emerges of the potential pitfalls inherent in neurofeedback. These narratives function a sobering reminder of the complexities of brain-based interventions and the essential significance of accountable, patient-centered care.
Let these accounts resonate as a cautionary story. The pursuit of wellness have to be guided by knowledgeable choices, real looking expectations, and a unwavering dedication to security. It’s important to prioritize thorough analysis, practitioner experience, and clear communication. The aim is to make sure that the trail to therapeutic doesn’t, via negligence or oversight, inadvertently result in additional hurt. The way forward for neurofeedback is determined by a dedication to moral practices and a deep respect for the fragile stability of the human mind.
